Total Pageviews

Monday, 18 February 2013

National Barford day 10th March

I noticed Paul posted a comment on his latest blog, saying the copyright infringement of my images hadn't  been the thing that closed his blog down on September 2011. He tried to blur the  statement by saying he had  received  threats from other sources, but didn't go into detail, but that's why he did it.

 Reading between the lines with  Paul being a  master of deceit, I believe it goes back to the fact I had  announced on the 12th September 2011 a National Barford day. This is where anyone who had images or work hosted on the Barford blog  which had been uploaded without the permission of the owner, to contact Google on a said day and claim copyright infringement. The day chosen was the 18th September.
Now wait for this by remarkable  coincidence this was the day the Barford blog disappeared for several weeks.

He is now making out he received threats at the time, but I believe he knew what was about to happen, as he had seen it published on this blog, so he downed his blog to protect it.

He knew if Google received multiple complaints on the same day they would have to act and close his blog down, and in a more severe case delete his Google account completely.

I would like to suggest we have another go because I believe this is his Achilles heel, if everyone on the 10th March 2013 files a complaint to Google about copyright infringements, for any work he is hosting which belongs to you. Having so many hits on the same day will close him down.
Check his blog for any past infringements a make a note where it can be found, then send your complaint to Google. Anything from stolen images to written word. He will try to claim 'fair use' for criticism but with so many complaint Google will have to act. 

This can only happen if we all pull together, we have had over 6000 hits on this blog, so Paul has many fans.

Read his blog and act now, every little counts!

If you see any pictures he has hosted on his blog even if it doesn't belong to you, it belongs to someone. Right click the image to bring up properties, and under general you will see the jpeg name, copy and paste that into Google and you will go back to the source. Here send a message to the owner of the image telling him his image is being used without his permission. That should do it, and tell them to complain on the 10th March


Monday, 11 February 2013

Paul Barford and his partners in crime


Paul Barford serial blogger and saviour of world heritage, makes regular accusations about historic sites being pillaged throughout the western world. He cites on his blog the Staffordshire Hoard site being visited by nighthawks as unfilled holes have been found across the field, and criticises the security measures being taken.

 What he fails to tell his viewers, is that he is often the instigator of many of these visits as last year he published on his blog the site of the Poulton Hoard. He even ran a guessing game as to which field it was found, guiding them to the particular field. He then congratulates two local lads who were also known nighthawks at guessing the exact spot. Well done Mr. Barford aren't we a clever chappie.

Three months later these two nighthawks were caught by the gamekeeper on the hoard field detecting and digging holes. They were ordered off and the details passed onto the local police. Now what Paul Barford has done as aider and abettor of a crime is become liable himself, even though he didn't actually hawk the fields himself, his intention was to purposefully assist, or otherwise promote the commission of a crime or a tort.

In a criminal offence, a person who aids and abets in a crime, participates in the commission of the crime by performing some overt act or by giving advice or encouragement. The person should be sharing the criminal intent of the person who actually commits the crime. However, it is not necessary for the aider and abettor to be physically present at the scene of the crime, or take part in the actual criminal offence. Under criminal law, an aider and abettor party to a crime will be criminally liable as a principal, an accessory before the fact, or an accessory after the fact. Maybe we will see you in court soon Paul!

Everyone knows I forced Paul to closed his blog down last year for several weeks, after he infringed on my copyright of 120 photographs, which he stole off my net album, and hosted directly on his blog without payment of £500 per image, which he had previously acknowledged was the fee.


Which I believe works out at £60,000,  Plus the edition of several items of treasure he found on the web and added them to my images, because nothing  I had posted contravened the Treasure Act, so he thought he would add some himself just to make sure it did. Which is also a criminal act , planting evidence on an innocent man, tut tut I could probably get you extradited for that one.


Also the strange phenomena of how an image posted by Paul on his blog, ends up as my screen saver on my computer which is password protected. This sounds a bit like hacking software to me, can't you be extradited for that. 



Does it not seem strange how Paul felt it necessary to delete his blog history of what he wrote at the time, if he is innocent, as he never deletes anything unless absolutely necessary and now he bleats on 'I've done nothing wrong Guv, I'm the victim in all this'.
For someone who spends there life attacking others, isn't it nice to see Paul squirming as he bounces between justification of his actions and damage limitation to his blog.


Oh and another thing Paul, making up claims I threatened to kill you, is another criminal offence, especially when you re-wrote it, as I have the original email.

This is also a guy who say's only a coward writes under a assumed name, from a guy who has removed all his photographs  off the net, because he is frightened of showing his face.


If you were a dog turd Paul, I'd step on you!

Well all I can say Paul is your the lowest form of life, far worse than any nighthawker or looter of sites. There you are criticising heritage loss, when all along you are actively encouraging it behind our backs.


Are you so bitter and twisted that you need to invent problems that don't exist, but then cause them with your own ignorance and stupidity. Paul say's the information was already available in the public domain, which the video was, but what spastic would freeze frame the images on the video, counting the trees in the hedgerow to then cross reference it with Google maps,  then pass on the information to known nighthawks who were viewing his blog. 

The reason why Paul did this, was so he could highlight the nighthawking problem, which he himself caused.  


If you view Google maps on China you will see a large yellow streak going across the landscape this will be the Yellow river, if you view Poland you will see the same thing, but this will probably be Paul's underpants.


If you don't like what I have written then may I suggest you get yourself a good Solicitor and sue me for libel, which is slightly pointless as I have all the evidence I need.